Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Charles J Gervasi's avatar

A free market for money is based on science, but appears almost magical in its power. When we do something for someone in exchange for money, we can spend that money on things we want or invest it in creating more means of production. We could buy a new phone, invest it in a company trying to create better phones, or we could save it for something we want in the future. If we save it, the bank pays interest and charges interest to people who borrow money to spend or invest. Without any central management, the market for money lets us choose if we want to consume now or consume more later. The bankers figure out who is likely to repay loans, which is a vital service. It allows the "baker, butcher, brewer," etc to focus on their trade and grow the money they earn without figuring how who is likely to repay. It also allows them to expand and serve more customers and earn more money if they do a good job serving existing customers.

Aristotle and some religions of the world have it wrong in condemning banking. Maybe there was something to their view when most of human production was a subsistence level of food produced by arable land plus human toil. Free markets and human ingenuity have made that ancient history. Basic food and shelter for all of humankind are a small fraction of human production now. Free markets for money helped make that possible.

No posts

Ready for more?